United States of America v. Marquis Larosa Buckley

22-7301Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 avr. 2023

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7301
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARQUIS LAROSA BUCKLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cr-00002-RBS-DEM-1)
Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 25, 2023
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marquis Larosa Buckley, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Comer Mozzi, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Marquis Larosa Buckley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First
Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We review the
district court’s order for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326,
329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did
not abuse its discretion in weighing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and concluding that
they did not support Buckley’s release.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.