In re: Deandre Johnson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1039
In re: DEANDRE JOHNSON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:21-cv-00511-RAJ-LRL)
Submitted: February 21, 2023 Decided: February 24, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deandre Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Deandre Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the
district court to grant relief on his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We conclude that
Johnson is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown,
LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when
the petitioner “has no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires” and
demonstrates “a clear and indisputable right” to that relief. Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at
795 (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted).
The relief sought by Johnson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly,
we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --