Jamaal A. Gittens v. STEVE HIGDON, Union County Judge; CHELSEY WILSON, Union County District Attorney

23-1053Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 juil. 2023

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1053
JAMAAL A. GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEVE HIGDON, Union County Judge; CHELSEY WILSON, Union County
District Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00165-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 27, 2023
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jamaal A. Gittens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint
for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Gittens v. Higdon, No. 3:22-cv-00165-
FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.