Lodise Wadley v. Warden R. Hudgins

23-6050Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 juin 2024

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6050
LODISE WADLEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN R. HUDGINS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Clarksburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00020-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: June 3, 2024 Decided: June 17, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lodise Wadley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lodise Wadley, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his felon-in-possession
convictions and his sentence by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e), and
denying his motion for reconsideration. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones
v. Hendrix, 599 U.S. 465, 477-80 (2023) (holding that a prisoner cannot use § 2241 petition
to mount successive collateral attack on validity of federal conviction or sentence), we
conclude that Wadley cannot pursue his claims in a § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s orders. Wadley v. Hudgins, No. 1:20-cv-00020-JPB-JPM
(N.D.W. Va. Dec. 13, 2022; Jan. 4, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.