Roger Keith Lunsford v. United States Department of Justice

23-6056Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10 déc. 2024

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6056
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, for the Middle District of North Carolina; FEDERAL
BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Charlotte, North Carolina and Greensboro, North
Carolina Field Offices,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00523-NCT-JLW)
Submitted: December 5, 2024 Decided: December 9, 2024
Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Keith Lunsford, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Childs, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Roger Keith Lunsford appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment to Defendants in Lunsford’s
action filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lunsford’s motion
for injunctive relief, and we affirm the district court’s order. Lunsford v. U.S. Dep’t of
Just., No. 1:21-cv-00523-NCT-JLW (M.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.