Robert G. Moore v. Warden of W.c.i. (shane Weber)

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7263
ROBERT G. MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OF W.C.I. (SHANE WEBER); NURSE TAMI OF W.C.I.; DOCTOR OF
W.C.I. (JOHN DOE); DPSCS (Commissioner); PAIGE JONES, Head of Director of
City Jail; SIERRA NOLAN, Nurse; RYAN BROWNING, NP; KRISTA SELF,
Practitioner; DR. KASAHUN TEMESGEN; MEDICAL HEALTH SERVICES
FOR BALTIMORE; CITY JAIL (Head Director of City Jail); DOCTOR FOR CITY
JAIL (John Doe); F.D.A. (Head director of F.D.A.) John Doe; BRITTANII
MANSTON, Nurse; HOLLY HOOVER, Practitioner; NURSE SICELLYER; DR.
ROBERT WILLIAMS; TEMEILA BENEGAR; PRISCILLA COBB; SANYA
ADEBAYO; MASOUD DJAHANMIR, Prescriber; GETACHEW, Provider;
DAYENDA CORCORAN, Commissioner of Corrections; FRANK BISHOP,
Warden of North Branch; JODI DOYLE, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (1:22-cv-01705-DKC)
Submitted: July 26, 2024 Decided: August 27, 2024
Before HARRIS and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Robert Gary Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Lucas William Baker Chrencik, GOODELL
DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Megan Trocki Mantzavinos,
MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Robert G. Moore appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint and
striking his second motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and Moore’s arguments
on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order
dismissing his claims. Moore v. Warden of W.C.I., No. 1:22-cv-01705-DKC (D. Md.
Nov. 13, 2023). We deny as moot Moore’s motions for an injunction and discovery. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --