Aldo Dibelardino v. JASON S. MIYARES, Virginia Attorney General

24-1269Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 oct. 2024

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1269
ALDO DIBELARDINO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JASON S. MIYARES, Virginia Attorney General; PETER V. CHIUSANO; MARK
S. SMITH; ROGER J. GRIFFIN; KRISTIE A. WOOTEN; STEPHEN C. MAHAN;
STEVEN C. FRUCCI; LESLIE L. LILLEY; A. BONWILL SHOCKLEY;
MICHAEL E. MCGINTY; LOUIS R. LERNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Jamar Kentrell Walker, District Judge. (2:23-cv-00225-JKW-LRL)
Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 24, 2024
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aldo DiBelardino, Appellant Pro Se. James Arthur Cales, III, FURNISS, DAVIS,
RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia; William Leonard Mitchell, II,
ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Fairfax, Virginia; Christopher Theodore Holinger, Mary
Teresa Morgan, INFINITY LAW GROUP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Aldo DiBelardino appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to
dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. DiBelardino v. Miyares, No. 2:23-
cv-00225-JKW-LRL (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.