Lindsey Knapp v. MARK AVERILL, Acting Secretary of the Army

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1662
LINDSEY KNAPP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARK AVERILL, Acting Secretary of the Army,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00433-BO-RJ)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 3, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Daniel Maharaj, SOLOMON, MAHARAJ & KASIMATI, P.A., Tampa,
Florida, for Appellant. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General,
Charles W. Scarborough, Joshua M. Koppel, Attorneys, Appellate Staff, Civil Division,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Michael F. Easley,
Jr., United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lindsey Knapp appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to
dismiss Knapp’s discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and denying
Knapp’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Knapp v. Wormuth, No. 5:23-cv-00433-BO-RJ (E.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2024). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --