United States of America v. Antonio Shropshire, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6074
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:16-cr-00051-SAG-3)
Submitted: May 21, 2024 Decided: May 24, 2024
Before WYNN and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Shropshire, Appellant Pro Se. Colleen Elizabeth McGuinn, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Shropshire appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a
sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Upon review of the record, we
conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Shropshire’s motion. See
United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we grant Shropshire’s motion to supplement his informal brief, and we affirm
the district court’s order. United States v. Shropshire, No. 1:16-cr-00051-SAG-3 (D. Md.
Jan. 2, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --