United States of America v. David William McConnell

24-6540Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 nov. 2024

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6540
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID WILLIAM MCCONNELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Beckley. Frank W. Volk, Chief District Judge. (5:22-cr-00124-1)
Submitted: November 19, 2024 Decided: November 22, 2024
Before QUATTLEBAUM, RUSHING, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David William McConnell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David William McConnell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 821 to the
Sentencing Guidelines. The district court found that McConnell was ineligible for the
reduction because his instant offense of conviction was a sex offense. See U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual § 4C1.1(a)(5), (b)(2) (2023).
Before addressing the merits of McConnell’s appeal, we grant McConnell’s pending
motion to seal the exhibits accompanying his informal brief. In addition, we have reviewed
the record and McConnell’s arguments on appeal, and we discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. McConnell, No. 5:22-
cr-00124-1 (S.D. W. Va. May 17, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.