United States of America v. Bradley Omar Jeffrey-Moe

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6661
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRADLEY OMAR JEFFREY-MOE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:19-cr-00165-AWA-RJK-1)
Submitted: September 25, 2025 Decided: September 29, 2025
Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley Omar Jeffrey-Moe, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Comer Mozzi, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Bradley Omar Jeffrey-Moe seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his
motion in which he contested the federal government’s jurisdiction over his criminal
prosecution and denying his motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; United States v. Lawrence, 201 F.3d 536, 537 (4th Cir.
2000) (“Piecemeal or interlocutory appeals are disfavored in the federal courts, especially
in criminal cases.” (citation omitted)). The orders Jeffrey-Moe seeks to appeal are neither
final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --