Willie Singleton v. City of Georgetown

25-1030Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 avr. 2025

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1030
WILLIE SINGLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
TONY VANDERHORST; EVELYN MCCRAY,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF GEORGETOWN; ROBERT DURANT COX; RYAN J. CALL; RICK
MARTIN; SANDRA E. YUDICE; BRENDON BARBER, Former Mayor;
CLARENCE SMALLS, Council Member; TUPELO HUMES, Council Member;
HENRY MILTON, Council Member; AL JOSEPH, Council Member; CAROL
JAYROE, Council Member and Mayor; JIM CLEMENTS, Council Member;
JOHNATHAN ANGNER, Council Member; JIMMY MORRIS, Council Member;
TAMEKA WILLIAMS OBENG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:23-cv-03594-RMG)
Submitted: April 10, 2025 Decided: April 15, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, RICHARDSON
PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Payton Hoover
RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, PA, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Willie Singleton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Vanderhorst v. City of Georgetown, No. 2:23-cv-
03594-RMG (D.S.C., Dec. 5, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.