Bradley Talmadge Livingston v. GIANT FOOD, Retail Store; AHOLD DELHAIZE

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1644
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GIANT FOOD, Retail Store; AHOLD DELHAIZE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02588-PX)
Submitted: March 12, 2026 Decided: March 17, 2026
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley Talmadge Livingston, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Charles Baldwin, SEYFARTH
SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Bradley Talmadge Livingston appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his
employment discrimination claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Livingston’s pending motions and affirm
the district court’s order. Livingston v. Giant Food, No. 1:24-cv-02588-PX (D. Md. June
4, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --