Hadarou Sare v. Christina Nikiforidou

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1888
HADAROU SARE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTINA NIKIFORIDOU, in her official capacity at the University of Maryland
College Park and under her individual capacity; CHENCHEN HANDLER, in her
official capacity at the University of Maryland College Park and under her individual
capacity; MARUKO KOGURE, in her official capacity at the University of
Maryland College Park and under her individual capacity; DAN SCHORR, in his
official capacity at the University of Maryland College Park and under his individual
capacity; HOSOM FATHY, in her official capacity at the University of Maryland
College Park and under her individual capacity; UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
AT COLLEGE PARK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:23-cv-02675-JRR)
Submitted: February 19, 2026 Decided: February 23, 2026
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Hadarou Sare, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Joyce Bradley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Megan Marie Jenkins,
ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Hadarou Sare appeals numerous district court’s orders entered in the underlying
action, including the court’s order (1) dismissing several Defendants based on Sare’s
failure to effect service of process; and (2) granting the two remaining Defendants’ motion
to dismiss Sare’s amended complaint.* On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We have reviewed the record in
conjunction with the issues raised in Sare’s informal brief and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s final order dismissing Sare’s amended
complaint without prejudice. Sare v. Nikiforidou, No. 1:23-cv-02675-JRR (D. Md. July
29, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Sare has filed motions seeking relief against most of the individual Defendants,
which we deny.

-- 3 of 3 --