Andrew A. Aquila v. LORRIE SINCLAIR TAYLOR, The Hon. in her official capacity as Chief Judge of the…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2167
ANDREW A. AQUILA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORRIE SINCLAIR TAYLOR, The Hon. in her official capacity as Chief Judge of
the Loudoun County General District Court; CHRISTINA M. HEISCHMIDT,
individually; GIOVANNA RAE BONAFEDE, individually; WILSON ELSER
MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP; SARAH E. LEWIS, individually;
HARRISLOFTUS, PLLC; CARLA M. CLARK, in her official capacity as Clerk of
the Loudoun County General District Court; MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, in his
official capacity as Sheriff of the Loudoun County; COUNTY OF LOUDOUN,
VIRGINIA; JAY JONES, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the
Commonwealth of Virginia; TGM MOOREFIELD LLC; TGM APARTMENT
PARTNERS LP; TRICIA KANE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:25-cv-01016-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: March 26, 2026 Decided: March 30, 2026
Before RICHARDSON and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Andrew A. Aquila, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew W. Lee, Giovanna Rae Bonafede,
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, McLean, Virginia;
Bradley Todd Canter, LAW OFFICES OF RONALD S. CANTER, LLC, Rockville,
Maryland; Debra Schneider Stafford, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, PC, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Andrew A. Aquila seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to
disqualify the district court judge and denying Aquila’s motion to vacate that order.* This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders Aquila seeks to appeal are
neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Aquila filed motions to disqualify counsel, to vacate void orders, to stay appellate
proceedings, to schedule oral argument, to certify a question of law to the United States
Supreme Court, and to expedite. We deny those motions.

-- 3 of 3 --