Phillip C. Reeves v. Scotty Bodiford

25-6496Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 mars 2026

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6496
PHILLIP C. REEVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCOTTY BODIFORD; DEHLEM COMPAGNA; KIMBERLY OLSZEWSKI;
RICHARD GILLESPIE; OFFICER KIRKENDOLL; D. VALEZ; WILLIAMS
ANDERSON; SERGEANT CROUCH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate Judge. (0:24-cv-06885-CMC-PJG)
Submitted: March 12, 2026 Decided: March 17, 2026
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Charles Reeves, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip C. Reeves seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order directing Reeves to
file a second amended complaint containing all the claims he sought to pursue. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Reeves seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.