Stephen D. Nolan v. Corizon Correctional Health Care

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6819
STEPHEN D. NOLAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORIZON CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE; BILL BEEMAN; HOLLY
PIERCE; JEFF SHOLEY; DR. LEONORA MUHAMMED; DR. VIVIEN
DORSEY; DR. MANDIP BARTELS; DR. SYLVIA AKINTADE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Brendan A. Hurson, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00327-BAH)
Submitted: June 25, 2026 Decided: June 30, 2026
Before BENJAMIN and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen D. Nolan, Appellant Pro Se. Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, MARKS, O’NEILL,
O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen D. Nolan appeals the district court’s order staying his civil rights action in
light of a bankruptcy court order and administratively closing the case.1 We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error, as the bankruptcy court’s order explicitly enjoins
Nolan from prosecuting this case in the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order.2 Nolan v. Corizon Corr. Health Care, No. 1:23-cv-00327-BAH (D. Md.
Aug. 22, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
1 Nolan has moved for leave to supplement his informal brief. We grant that motion.
2 Before Nolan noted this appeal, he filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion in the
district court. The denial of that motion is not before us because Nolan did not file an
amended notice of appeal after the district court denied the motion. Fed. R. App. P.
4(a)(4)(B)(ii).

-- 2 of 2 --