RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. MARIA CHERNIAVSKA, Future First Lady of United States by 2028 in a Parallel Universe

26-1152Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 mai 2026

Texte intégral

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-1152
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Presidential Candidate Number P60005535;
PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897,
d/b/a United Emrits of America,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
MARIA CHERNIAVSKA, Future First Lady of United States by 2028 in a Parallel
Universe; VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY, President of Ukraine; ESTATE OF
ALEXEI NAVALNY; DARYA IGNATEVA; KATERYNA OLOKOBA; ERIN
BURNETT, Outfront of Cable News Network (CNN); INTERNATIONAL COURT
OF JUSTICE OF HAGUE; UNITED NATION, UN; WORLD BANK, International
Monetary Fund (IMF); COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:26-cv-00011-FL-BM)
Submitted: May 21, 2016 Decided: May 27, 2026
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit seeks to appeal the district court’s order directing him to correct
deficiencies in the initial filing of his civil complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.
541, 545-46 (1949). The order Emrit seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.