PSKS Inc, et al v. Leegin Creative

04-41243Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit5 sept. 2007

Texte intégral

* District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting
by designation.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 30, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-41243
PSKS, INC., doing business as Kay’s Kloset ... Kay’s Shoes;
TONI COCHRAN L.L.C., doing business as Toni’s,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
versus
LEEGIN CREATIVE LEATHER PRODUCTS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before BARKSDALE and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges, and ENGELHARDT,
District Judge*.
PER CURIAM:
Our court upheld application of the antitrust per se rule to
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.’s imposing a vertical
minimum price-fixing agreement on its retailer, PSKS, Inc., doing
business as Kay’s Kloset ... Kay’s Shoes. PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin
Creative Leather Prods., Inc., 171 F. App’x 464 (5th Cir. 2006).
The Supreme Court reversed, holding “[v]ertical price restraints
are to be judged according to the rule of reason” and “remanded for

-- 1 of 2 --

2
proceedings consistent with [its] opinion”. Leegin Creative
Leather Prods., Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2705, 2725 (2007).
Accordingly, this action is REMANDED to district court for
proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
REMANDED

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.