Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 28, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-51558
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAYMOND KASTNER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:04-CR-242-1
--------------------
Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Raymond Kastner appeals his conviction for being a felon in
possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues
that the evidence at trial was insufficient because his ex-wife,
Christine Grinie, was not a credible witness. This court’s
review for sufficiency of the evidence is not concerned with the
credibility of witnesses or the weight of the evidence, which is
the exclusive province of the jury. United States v. Garcia,
995 F.2d 556, 561 (5th Cir. 1993). Moreover, given the evidence
at trial, Kastner has not shown that his conviction resulted in a
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 05-51558
-2-
manifest miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Thomas,
12 F.3d 1350, 1358 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
