Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 18, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-20085
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VELIA NAJERA RAMIREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-482-7
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Velia Najera Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following
her guilty-plea conviction of illegal use of a communication
facility, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). Najera Ramirez’s
sole issue on appeal is that the district court erred by ordering
her to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition
of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on
direct appeal. See United States v. Carmichael, 343 F.3d 756,
761-62 (5th Cir. 2003). Najera Ramirez concedes that this issue
is foreclosed.
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 06-20085
-2-
APPEAL DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
