Summary Calendar LEROY EVANS, JR. v. William K. Suter

07-20588Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit28 déc. 2007

Texte intégral

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-20588
Summary Calendar
LEROY EVANS, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM K. SUTER,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court from the
Southern District of Texas, Houston Division
Civil Action No. 4:07-CV-1557
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Evans filed this action against Suter, the Clerk of the Supreme Court,
after the Supreme Court denied certiorari and denied a petition for the
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 28, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-20588
2
rehearing of that denial. Evans’s main complaint seems to be Suter’s failure to
file one or more additional petitions for rehearing.
Clerks have absolute quasi-judicial immunity from damages for civil rights
violations when they perform tasks integral to the judicial process. Mullis v.
United States Bankr. Court for Dist. of Nevada, 828 F.2d 1385, 1390 (9th Cir.
1987) (citing Morrison v. Jones, 607 F.2d 1269, 1273 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied,
445 U.S. 962 (1980). Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that Appellee
was performing appropriate official functions integral to the judicial process. As
such, Appellee is entitled to quasi-judicial immunity against the action brought
by Appellant. Essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s June 29,
2007 Memorandum and Opinion we affirm the judgment of the district court.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.