Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio; Planned Parenthood of Southwest Ohio Region v. Lance Himes

16-4027Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit21 juin 2018

Texte intégral

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)
File Name: 18a0115p.06
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO; PLANNED
PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LANCE HIMES, in his official capacity as Interim
Director of the Ohio Department of Health,
Defendant-Appellant.









No. 16-4027
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc.
Decided and Filed: June 21, 2018
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, SUTTON, COOK,
GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR,
BUSH, LARSEN, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges.
_________________
ORDER
_________________
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en
banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous
opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on
the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are
vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
>

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 16-4027 Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, et al. v. Himes Page 2
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for
oral argument as soon as possible.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.