Danny Hill v. CARL ANDERSON, Warden

14-3718Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit15 juil. 2020

Texte intégral

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)
File Name: 20a0215p.06
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
DANNY HILL,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
CARL ANDERSON, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.










Nos. 99-4317/14-3718
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Ohio at Youngstown.
No. 4:96-cv-00795—John R. Adams, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: July 15, 2020
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, SUTTON,
GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR,
BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, and READLER, Circuit Judges.*
_________________
ORDER
_________________
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en
banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous
opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on
the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are
vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
* Judge Murphy recused himself from participation in this decision.
>

-- 1 of 2 --

Nos. 99-4317/14-3718 Hill v. Anderson Page 2
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for
oral argument as soon as possible.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.