United States of America v. Gabriel Campos-Cisneros, also known as Graciano Cisneros-Luviano, also known as…

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1092
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Appellee
v.
Gabriel Campos-Cisneros, also known as Graciano Cisneros-Luviano, also known
as Craciano Luviano, also known as Craciano Cisneros-Luviavan, also known as
Jorge Campos, also known as Jorge Cisneros
lllllllllllllllllllll Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: June 4, 2013
Filed: June 7, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM.
Gabriel Campos-Cisneros appeals the 59-month prison sentence imposed by
the district court after he pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the country after1
having been deported subsequent to a drug-trafficking conviction, in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a
brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the court’s
criminal-history determination. Because Mr. Campos-Cisneros affirmatively
withdrew his criminal-history objection at the sentencing hearing, however, we
decline to review the issue. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993)
(waiver is intentional relinquishment or abandonment of known right and is not
reviewable on appeal); United States v. Harrison, 393 F.3d 805, 806 (8th Cir. 2005)
(finding waiver of objections when counsel confirmed at sentencing that there were
no objections); United States v. Thompson, 289 F.3d 524, 526-27 (8th Cir. 2002)
(where lawyer who represented defendant in district court withdrew defendant’s
objections to presentence report, he was precluded from arguing those objections on
appeal).
Further, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing appellant about
procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari, and we affirm.
______________________________
The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western1
District of Missouri.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --