Mitchell D. Fields v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

10-1304Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 juil. 2013

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-3827
___________________________
Mitchell D. Fields
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
United Parcel Service, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: June 24, 2013
Filed: July 3, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Mitchell D. Fields appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary1
judgment in this diversity employment-discrimination action under the Missouri
The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court1
for the Eastern District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

Human Rights Act. Fields offers no valid basis, and we find none, for overturning2
the district court’s well-reasoned decision. See Porter v. City of Lake Lotawana, 651
F.3d 894, 897-98 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment,
viewing record in light most favorable to non-movant); Melford Olsen Honey, Inc.
v. Adee, 452 F.3d 956, 966 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing de novo district court’s
application of state law). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
Claims, allegations, and arguments may not be advanced for first time on2
appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004).
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.