Hunter R. Levi v. AB INBEV NV of Leuven Belgium, & Its Wholly Owned U.S. Subsidiary Anheuser Busch…

12-3968Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30 avr. 2014

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3180
___________________________
Hunter R. Levi
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
AB INBEV NV of Leuven Belgium, & Its Wholly Owned U.S. Subsidiary
Anheuser Busch Companies, Inc.; Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: April 3, 2014
Filed: April 10, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Hunter R. Levi appeals following the district court’s adverse grant of summary1
judgment in his action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act,
see 29 U.S.C. § 185, and Section 510 of the Employment Retirement Income Security
Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 1140. We agree with the district court that the record evidence
revealed no disputed issues of material fact on Levi’s claims against Anheuser-Busch
Companies, LLC. See Sturge v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 658 F.3d 832, 839 (8th Cir. 2011)
(de novo review). We also find that Levi’s claims would have necessarily failed
against the other parties he originally named or sought to add later as defendants.
Finally, we decline to consider Levi’s new arguments and allegations. See Stone v.
Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004). The judgment of the district court is
affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Missouri.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.