Nancy T. Keselyak v. The Curators of the University of Missouri

15-1900Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 août 2017

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-4131
___________________________
Nancy T. Keselyak
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
The Curators of the University of Missouri
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
____________
Submitted: August 2, 2017
Filed: August 10, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Nancy Keselyak appeals the district court’s dismissal of her lawsuit brought1
under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Keselyak, a tenured professor at
The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

the University of Missouri Kansas City School of Dentistry (University), argues that
the University violated her rights under the FMLA when it suspended her salary when
she was unable to return to work following an injury and failed to request FMLA
leave. She also argues that the district court erred in denying her motion for default
judgment.
After careful review, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial
of Keselyak’s default motion. See Comiskey v. JFTJ Corp., 989 F.2d 1007, 1009-10
(8th Cir. 1993) (abuse-of-discretion review of denial of motion for default judgment).
We also conclude that the district court properly dismissed the complaint, see Butler
v. Bank of Am., N.A., 690 F.3d 959, 961 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of motion to dismiss
for failure to state a claim reviewed de novo), as the University was entitled to
sovereign immunity, see Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Md., 566 U.S. 30, 43-44
(2012) (Congress did not abrogate states’ sovereign immunity from suits for money
damages in enacting FMLA’s self-care provision). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th
Cir. R. 47B, and deny Keselyak’s pending motions.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.