Lloyd N. Hamm, Jr. v. Dr. Charles Liggett; Nurse Dream M. Redic-Young

18-1371Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 juil. 2019

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-2386
___________________________
Lloyd N. Hamm, Jr.
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Dr. Charles Liggett; Nurse Dream M. Redic-Young
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs
____________
Submitted: July 2, 2019
Filed: July 19, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before KELLY, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, former Arkansas inmate Lloyd N. Hamm, Jr.,
appeals from the orders of the District Court1 granting summary judgment to
1The Honorable P. K. Holmes, III, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

defendants. Viewing the record in a light most favorable to Hamm and drawing all
reasonable inferences in his favor, we conclude that summary judgment was properly
granted to defendant Dr. Charles Liggett.2 See Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771
(8th Cir.) (standards of review), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 211 (2015). We affirm, and
we deny as moot the pending motion to dismiss.
______________________________
2Hamm has abandoned his claims against defendant nurse Dream Redic-Young.
See Hess v. Ables, 714 F.3d 1048, 1051 n.2 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that a claim
challenging dismissal was abandoned when the appellant failed to brief the issue).
Further, the other matters Hamm raises on appeal provide no basis for reversal.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.