United States of America v. Vernon Williams

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-2857
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Vernon Williams,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: March 18, 2020
Filed: March 23, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Vernon Williams appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he
pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed
1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive
reasonableness of Williams’s sentence.
Upon careful review under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, see Gall
v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007), we conclude that the district court did not
impose an unreasonable sentence. The court properly considered the factors set forth
in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and there is no indication that the court committed a clear
error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See United States v. Salazar-Aleman,
741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review). Further, having
independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find
no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion and
affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --