James Richard Huntsman v. 3M Company, a Delaware corporation

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3081
___________________________
James Richard Huntsman
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
3M Company, a Delaware corporation; 3M Company Employee Retirement
Income Plan; Zenith Annette Huntsman; Plan Administrator for the 3M Employee
Retirement Income Plan
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: June 1, 2020
Filed: June 4, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

James Huntsman appeals after the district court1 dismissed his action asserting
claims related to a series of Minnesota court orders modifying his spousal
maintenance obligations. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’
arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Newcombe v. United States,
933 F.3d 915, 917 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --