United States of America v. Michael K. Sinnawi

20-1960Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30 juil. 2021

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-1043
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Michael K. Sinnawi
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of North Dakota - Western
____________
Submitted: July 27, 2021
Filed: July 30, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Sinnawi pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute
oxycodone. See 18 U.S.C. § 2; 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). As part of his plea
agreement, he waived his right to appeal his sentence unless, as relevant here, it
exceeded “the upper limit of the [advisory] [S]entencing [G]uideline[s] range”

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
calculated by the district court.1 The court gave him a 36-month sentence, which
was within the range it calculated. In an Anders brief, Sinnawi’s counsel raises the
substantive reasonableness of the sentence and requests permission to withdraw. See
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
We review the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver de novo. See
United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010). Upon careful review, we
conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable and that it is applicable to the issue
raised on appeal. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir. 2003)
(en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within
the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the
plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a
miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record and
conclude that no other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,
82–83 (1988). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel permission to
withdraw.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for the
District of North Dakota.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.