Texte intégral
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-3143
___________________________
Ryan N. Jackman; Jessica K. Jackman
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Members Cooperative Credit Union
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: July 27, 2022
Filed: August 1, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota residents Ryan and Jessica Jackman appeal the district court’s1
dismissal of their pro se complaint on res judicata grounds. Upon careful de novo
1The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
review, see Smith v. Johnson, 779 F.3d 867, 870 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review),
we conclude that the district court did not err in finding that the claims were barred
by res judicata, see Ashanti v. City of Golden Valley, 666 F.3d 1148, 1151 (8th Cir.
2012) (law of forum that rendered first judgment controls res judicata analysis);
Hauschildt v. Beckingham, 686 N.W.2d 829, 840 (Minn. 2004) (en banc) (elements
of res judicata under Minnesota law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --