George T. Sullivan v. Vetis S. Malone, Corporal, Varner Supermax

22-2057Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28 févr. 2023

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-2157
___________________________
George T. Sullivan
Plaintiff Appellant
v.
Vetis S. Malone, Corporal, Varner Supermax; Brandon C. Carroll, Chief of
Security, Major, Varner Supermax
Defendants Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
____________
Submitted: January 30, 2023
Filed: February 10, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

George Sullivan appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record,
we find no basis for reversal. See Morris v. Cradduck, 954 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir.
2020) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d
781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (reviewing de novo 28 U.S.C. § 1915A
dismissal). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Sullivan’s
pending motion.
______________________________
1The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of
Arkansas.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.