United States of America v. Charles Rouell, also known as Charley

22-2057Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28 févr. 2023

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-3001
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Charles Rouell, also known as Charley
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: February 2, 2023
Filed: February 8, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Rouell appeals after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute
methamphetamine. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence.

-- 1 of 2 --

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court1 did not err in
imposing the below-Guidelines sentence that Rouell received. See United States v.
Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc); United States v. Moore, 581
F.3d 681, 684 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). The record reflects that the court properly
calculated the Guidelines range and considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and
there is no indication the court overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear
error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. Specifically, the court did not err in
characterizing Rouell as deeply involved in the conspiracy; and although the sentence
was longer than those of some of his codefendants, it was adequately justified based
on his role in the conspiracy and his significant criminal history. See United States
v. Farmer, 647 F.3d 1175, 1179 (8th Cir. 2011); United States v. Vasquez, 433 F.3d
666, 671 (8th Cir. 2006).
We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we
grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.
______________________________
1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.