United States of America v. Donna Jenkins

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-1621
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Donna Jenkins,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
____________
Submitted: July 19, 2023
Filed: August 2, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Donna Jenkins appeals a sentence imposed by the district court1 after Jenkins
pleaded guilty to a drug offense. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief
1The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the reasonableness of
the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that Jenkins’s sentence was not
unreasonable. There is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant
factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a
clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v.
Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc).
We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we
affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --