William A. Hughes, II v. Team Car Care, LLC, doing business as Jiffy Lube

23-1329Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30 nov. 2023

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-2531
___________________________
William A. Hughes, II
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Team Car Care, LLC, doing business as Jiffy Lube
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: October 31, 2023
Filed: November 3, 2023
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Team Car Care, LLC, appeals the district court’s1 denial of its motion to
compel arbitration of Title VII claims of race discrimination and unlawful retaliation
1The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

asserted by its former employee, William Hughes II. After careful de novo review,
we conclude that the court did not err, as it correctly concluded after an evidentiary
hearing that Team Car Care failed to meet its burden to prove the existence of a valid
and enforceable arbitration agreement under Missouri law. See Shockley v.
PrimeLending, 929 F.3d 1012, 1020 (8th Cir. 2019); M.A. Mortenson Co. v.
Saunders Concrete Co., 676 F.3d 1153, 1157 (8th Cir. 2012); AgGrow Oils, L.L.C.
v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 242 F.3d 777, 780 (8th Cir. 2001).
Team Car Care’s argument that the threshold issue of arbitrability should have been
decided by an arbitrator rather than the district court is without merit. See United
States for Use of Lighting & Power Servs.,Inc. v. Interface Construc. Corp., 553 F.3d
1150, 1154 (8th Cir. 2009). Because the parties disputed whether there was an
arbitration agreement, the issue was properly decided by the district court. See Neb.
Mach. Co. v. Cargotec Solutions, LLC, 762 F.3d 737, 741 n.2 (8th Cir. 2014).
Accordingly, the Order of the district court dated June 13, 2023, is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.