Joshua A. Lapin v. EverQuote, Inc., also known as EverQuote

21-2459Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit29 mars 2024

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 23-2184
___________________________
Joshua A. Lapin
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
EverQuote, Inc., also known as EverQuote; John Doe Sender, doing business as
BuzzBarrelReview.com, doing business as dzlosurverys.com, doing business as
emails-jobsdelivered.com, doing business as Entirelybelieve.com, doing business
as JobsDeliver.com, doing business as expectcarecare.com, doing business as
JobSharkNL.com, doing business as NationalShopperSurvey.com, doing business
as NationalSurveysOnline.com, doing business as exigentmediagroup.com, doing
business as enrichedtechnologies.com, doing business as
ConsumerDigitalSurvey.com, doing business as drivingmarketinggroup.com,
doing business as surveyandgetpaid.com, doing business as
tummyheadmediagroup.com, doing business as thebestcreditcheck.com, doing
business as thefreetree.co, doing business as dlzoffers.com, doing business as
nationaldigitalsurvey.com, doing business as dealzingo.com, doing business as
rumorfox.com
Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Southern
____________
Submitted: March 11, 2024
Filed: March 14, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
Before BENTON, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Joshua Lapin appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se
complaint for failure to state a claim. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
this court affirms.
After careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ arguments on
appeal, this court concludes that Lapin had standing to raise his claims, see
TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021); see also Rydholm v. Equifax Info.
Servs. LLC, 44 F.4th 1105, 1108 (8th Cir. 2022) (appellate court can review standing
for first time on appeal); and finds no basis for reversal, see Jessie v. Potter, 516
F.3d 709, 712 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review); First Colony Life Ins. Co. v.
Berube, 130 F.3d 827, 829 (8th Cir. 1997) (same).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.