United States of America v. Justin James Monchamp

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-1194
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Justin James Monchamp
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: September 23, 2024
Filed: October 2, 2024
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM.
Justin James Monchamp appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised
release and sentenced him to 12 months’ imprisonment. He challenges the substantive
reasonableness of his revocation sentence.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in imposing a revocation sentence of 12 months’ imprisonment.
See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-17 (8th Cir. 2009). The revocation
sentence is within the Guidelines range, and we afford it a presumption of substantive
reasonableness on appeal. See United States v. Weems, 76 F.4th 1153, 1156 (8th Cir.
2023). The district court did not overlook a relevant factor, give significant weight
to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commit a clear error of judgment in weighing
the relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923–24 (8th Cir.
2006).
Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
1The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --