Flomo Tealeh v. United States Postal Service

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-2155
___________________________
Flomo Tealeh
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
United States Postal Service; Mohammad Ali; David Emerson; Scott Woltering;
John Does, 1-100
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
Acting Postmaster General Doug Tulino; Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney General1;
Andrew M. Luger, U.S. Attorney General District of Minnesota
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: June 11, 2025
Filed: June 16, 2025
[Unpublished]
____________
1Doug Tulino has been appointed to serve as Acting Postmaster General, and
Pamela Bondi has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the United States,
and are substituted as appellees pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
43(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Flomo Tealeh appeals following the district court’s2 dismissal and subsequent
adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action against
the United States Postal Service. Upon careful review, we conclude that dismissal
of the complaint was proper for the reasons articulated in the district court’s orders.
See Brown v. Conagra Brands, Inc., 131 F.4th 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2025) (de novo
review of court’s grant of motion to dismiss); Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643
F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (de novo review of grant of summary
judgment).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
We also deny Tealeh’s motions to file an amended reply brief.
______________________________
2The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, now retired, partially granted the motion to dismiss. The
Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota granted the summary judgment motion.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --