United States of America v. Shane Dean See Walker

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-3423
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Shane Dean See Walker
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of North Dakota - Western
____________
Submitted: April 2, 2026
Filed: April 7, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Shane Dean See Walker appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised
release and sentenced him to a prison term of 24 months and two additional months
1The Honorable Daniel M. Traynor, United States District Judge for the District
of North Dakota.

-- 1 of 2 --

of supervised release. After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in imposing the sentence. See United States v. Richey, 758 F.3d
999, 1001 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review); United States v. Maluoth, 121 F.4th
1158, 1163 (8th Cir. 2024) (district court abuses its discretion when it fails to
consider relevant factor that should have received significant weight, gives significant
weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or considers only appropriate factors but in
weighing them commits clear error of judgment). The district court considered the
relevant factors and the record evidence supported the sentence imposed. See United
States v. Misquadace, 778 F.3d 717, 719 (8th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (district courts
have wide latitude to weigh the relevant factors and assign some greater weight than
others in determining appropriate sentence); United States v. Rodd, 966 F.3d 740, 748
(8th Cir. 2020) (district court presumed to have considered mitigating factors
advanced by defendant).
Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --