United States of America v. Travis Michael Crissler

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-1247
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Travis Michael Crissler
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of North Dakota - Eastern
____________
Submitted: May 1, 2026
Filed: May 6, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Travis Crissler appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking
his supervised release for a third time. On appeal, he argues the above-Guidelines-
1The Honorable Peter D. Welte, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of North Dakota.

-- 1 of 2 --

range 24-month prison term with no supervised release to follow is a substantively
unreasonable sentence.
After review, we conclude that the sentence is not substantively unreasonable,
as the record reflects that the district court adequately considered the relevant
sentencing factors and did not give significant weight to an improper factor or
commit clear error of judgment in weighing factors. See United States v. Miller, 557
F.3d 910, 917-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Larison, 432
F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006). The district court did not abuse its discretion in
weighing some relevant factors more heavily than others, see United States v.
Bridges, 569 F.3d 374, 379 (8th Cir. 2009); or by imposing the instant sentence to run
consecutively to certain of Crissler’s state court sentences, see United States v.
Johnson, 827 F.3d 740, 745 (8th Cir. 2016).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --