Tricia Marie Myers v. Itasca County HRA; Diane Larson; Carrie Schmitz; Kenda Roddenberg

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-3122
___________________________
Tricia Marie Myers
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Itasca County HRA; Diane Larson; Carrie Schmitz; Kenda Roddenberg
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: June 18, 2026
Filed: June 24, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LAVENSKI R. SMITH, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Tricia Myers appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful consideration of the
1The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.

-- 1 of 2 --

record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court
permissibly relied on a declaration submitted by defendant Diane Larson. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 56(c)(4) (affidavit used to support a motion for summary judgment must
be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence,
and show that affiant is competent to testify on matters stated). We also conclude that
summary judgment was proper. See Lloyd v. FedLoan Servicing, 105 F.4th 1020,
1024 (8th Cir. 2024) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --