United States of America v. Lionel Cawthon

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 25-3482
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Lionel Cawthon
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: July 24, 2026
Filed: July 29, 2026
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Lionel Cawthon received a 262-month sentence after he pleaded guilty to a
drug offense. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(vi), 846. An Anders brief
suggests that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. See Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
We conclude otherwise. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461–
62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion). The record
establishes that the district court1 sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing
factors, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a
clear error of judgment. See United States v. McDaniels, 19 F.4th 1065, 1067 (8th
Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (explaining that the district court has “latitude to weigh the
relevant sentencing factors . . . differently than a defendant would have preferred”
(citation omitted)).
We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other
non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988). We
accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission
to withdraw.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, then District Judge, now Chief Judge,
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

-- 2 of 2 --