Shagdar Boldmyagmar; Yagaan Altantsetseg; Boldmyagmar Chinzorig; Boldmyagmar Chinbayar v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHAGDAR BOLDMYAGMAR;
YAGAAN ALTANTSETSEG;
BOLDMYAGMAR CHINZORIG;
BOLDMYAGMAR CHINBAYAR,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-73814
Agency Nos. A097-583-345
A097-583-346
A097-583-347
A097-583-348
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted April 16, 2013
San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Shagdar Boldmyagmar petitions for review of the decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)
decision denying relief. Petitioner’s appeal to the BIA did not raise any issue with
FILED
APR 23 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
respect to the translation or his ability to understand and participate in the
proceedings. He did not exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to these
contentions. Tall v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 1115, 1120 (9th Cir. 2008).
Petitioner did advance a general challenge to the adverse credibility findings,
but those findings are supported by substantial evidence. Specifically, the record
contains numerous inconsistencies, noted by the IJ, concerning the nature and
extent of his political involvement, as well as the conduct of the police. As several
of these inconsistencies go to the heart of Petitioner’s claim, the court must accept
the adverse credibility finding. See Wang v. I.N.S., 352 F.3d 1250, 1259 (9th Cir.
2003).
Petition for review is DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --