Luis Cabrera-Campos, a.k.a. Luis Campos-Cabrera, a.k.a. Jesus Garcia Miranda v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS CABRERA-CAMPOS, a.k.a. Luis
Campos-Cabrera, a.k.a. Jesus Garcia
Miranda,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-70463
Agency No. A099-625-275
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 10, 2013**
Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Luis Cabrera-Campos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
FILED
JUN 13 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-70463 2
immigration judge’s denial of cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion.
We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Cabrera-
Campos’s application for cancellation of removal did not warrant a favorable
exercise of discretion. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (barring review of denials
of discretionary relief). Cabrera-Campos’s contentions that the agency applied an
incorrect standard of review, failed to consider relevant evidence, and was biased
are not supported by the record and are not colorable claims invoking our
jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d
926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[T]raditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as
alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that
would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --