United States of America v. Othon Ramirez-Rojas

13-10188Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 mai 2014

Texte intégral

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
OTHON RAMIREZ-ROJAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 13-10188
13-10200
D.C. Nos. 4:12-cr-02227-DCB
4:11-cr-00221-DCB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 13, 2014**
Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Othon Ramirez-Rojas appeals his guilty-plea
conviction and 15-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8
U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive 18-month
sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
FILED
MAY 27 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

(1967), Ramirez-Rojas’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds
for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Ramirez-Rojas the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
13-10188 & 13-10200 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.