Ossie Lee Slaughter v. JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OSSIE LEE SLAUGHTER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-35947
D.C. No. 4:16-cv-05109-LRS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Washington
Lonny R. Suko, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 18, 2017**
Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Ossie Lee Slaughter, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay
the filing fee after denying Slaughter’s application to proceed in forma pauperis
(“IFP”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
DEC 26 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 16-35947
district court’s interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Harris v.
Mangum, 863 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.
The district court properly denied Slaughter’s motion to proceed IFP
because at the time Slaughter filed the complaint, Slaughter had filed three actions
or appeals that qualified as “strikes,” and Slaughter did not plausibly allege that he
was “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time he lodged the
complaint or the appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Harris, 863 F.3d at 1143 (“[W]hen
(1) a district court dismisses a complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim,
(2) the court grants leave to amend, and (3) the plaintiff then fails to file an
amended complaint, the dismissal counts as a strike under § 1915(g).”); Richey v.
Dahne, 807 F.3d 1202, 1208 (9th Cir. 2015) (appellate court’s denial of IFP
because the appeal is frivolous counts as a “strike” even though the court does not
dismiss the appeal until later, after appellant fails to pay the filing fee).
We reject as meritless Slaughter’s contentions of judicial misconduct or bias.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --