United States of America v. Abram Paul Walter

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ABRAM PAUL WALTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-30037
D.C. No. 4:96-cr-00026-HRH
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Alaska
H. Russel Holland, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 13, 2018**
Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Abram Paul Walter appeals from the district court’s order granting
authorization for funds to be paid from his inmate trust account toward his
restitution obligation, the court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of that
order, and the court’s amended judgment establishing a restitution payment
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 16 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 17-30037
schedule. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Walter’s counsel
has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Walter the opportunity to file a
pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --