Indratati Selamet v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
INDRATATI SELAMET,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 18-70077
Agency No. A088-129-499
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 19, 2019**
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Indratati Selamet, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen
removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
abuse of discretion, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 26 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-70077
we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Selamet’s untimely motion
to reopen where Selamet failed to establish materially changed country conditions
in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory exception to the filing deadline. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)-(3); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 986 (“The BIA can deny a
motion to reopen [for] . . . failure to introduce previously unavailable, material
evidence . . .” (citation omitted)).
We deny Selamet’s request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 12).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --